RICO Romney BAIN This is a new and growing section of free document downloads here at BankruptcyMisconduct which memorializes the RICO complaint against Mitt Romney & Bain Capital, Paul Traub and their associates. We believe that conflict of interest issues will ultimately be the downfall of Romney and his dirty peeps. DocumentsDate addedUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Steven (“Laser”) Haas “Pro se” 108 E Jewel Street Delmar, DE 19940 Laser.Haas@yahoo.com Plaintiff, v. Willard Mitt Romney 311 Dunemere Drive La Jolla, California Paul Traub C/O Rosner 824 Market St. Wilmington, DE 19801 Bain Capital 335 Bryant St Palo Alto, CA 94301 John & Jane “Doe’s” 1 thru 20 Case No.: No. 12-3-456789-1 COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Bain Capital’s Toys R Us entity is in the possession of the stolen property of eToys. Prior to this time, MNAT (as eToys debtor’s counsel) and Paul Traub (as eToys Creditors’ counsel), confessed lying thirty (30) times to this court deliberately to conceal their conflicts of interest to multiple parties. The Code & Rule of Law under Section 327(a) unambiguously dictates their disqualification.
However, due to corruption, the court was unwittingly duped to pardon them. They took the pearl of leniency and trampled over this court with further lies. Hiding the fact that they all (secretly) work for Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital in their sinful quest to destroy the eToys public company. A neon elephant in the room that no one, thus far, has been able to see, is Bain Capital CEO’s wicked desire to be “retroactively” resigned from the eToys crimes in 2001.
This sworn affidavit by Haas establishes his standing as a party in interest to the eToys bankruptcy case, in which allegations are made connecting Mitt Romney to a number of lawyers and bankruptcy professionals who have admitted making false statements while hiding their conflict of interest.
In accordance with court rules, the filing of the Emergency Motion against Romney and his associates automatically establishes deadlines for Romney and his associates to respond. The motion includes this warning: If you wish to file a response to the Emergency Motion noted above, you must do son on or be-fore November 02, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. ET (the “Objection Deadline). At the same time, you must also serve a copy of your response to this ‘pro se’ party, the court, the United States Trustees and all other current parties of interest.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE For Emergency Motion October 22, 2012 Greg Werkheiser |
Latest Documents
|
Most Downloaded
- CA Bar Complaint (13020)
- SONICblue - A Claims Trader's Fees Reimbursed for Alerting about Attorney Misconduct (10739)
- Haas v. Romney 2nd Amended Complaint (10256)
- CA Bar **Revised** Complaint (9386)
- SEC filings by client of PriceWaterhouseCoopers and HBD (9128)
- Doug Pick Esq. advice on Death Threats (9079)
- Judicial Complaint against Judge Paul G. Hyman by Mary Alice Gwynn (8672)
- Shock! Peck's Lehman case colored by fraud? (8404)
- SEC - so simple even a Caveman can see it! (8136)
- Bharara Gets Compaint On Judge Lippmann (8120)