Details for 3rd Amended Complaint
Property | Value |
Name | 3rd Amended Complaint |
Description | As repeated by His Honor Circuit Judge Michael Daly Hawkins; “Truth needs no disguise”
Docketed confessions of fraud on the court are core to plaintiff’s case; but no proper adjudication upon the merits of the condemnatory has transpired. ”In this Circuit’s case of Dixon v Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 00-70858, His Honor Michael Daly Hawkins discussed governing issues of fraud on the court, by officers of the court citing the U.S. Supreme Court case of In re Hazel-Atlas Glass v Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 247 (1944).
Docketed confessions of fraud on the court are core to plaintiff’s case; but no proper adjudication upon the merits of the condemnatory has transpired.
It should be axiomatic that integrity of the judicial process and a counsel’s loyalty to a client are sacrosanct. Yet, the gravity of artful premeditated collusion to gain unjust enrichment via frauds on the court and betrayal of a client’s trust/ breach of court ordered fiduciary duty; has been inexplicably/intolerably ignored.
Emboldened by federal agents/agencies willful blindness and/or staunch refusals to prosecute wealthy parties; Defendants now seek to utilize visible frauds on court to stymie justice here. Culprits brought to (some) justice by whistleblower are being permitted to cry vexatious. Surely a victim of organized crimes unseemly benefiting from venal feds permitting attorneys to betray their court approved clients; most certainly grants any quarry the right to vex the malfeasants! |
Filename | RICO_eToys_Clockd_Apr14_DI_69_Motion_for_and_3rd_Amended_Complaint.pdf |
Filesize | 2.18 MB |
Filetype | pdf (Mime Type: application/pdf) |
Creator | admin |
Created On: |
09/14/2014 21:32 |
Viewers | Everybody |
Maintained by | Editor |
Hits | 4702 Hits |
Last updated on |
09/14/2014 21:40 |
Homepage | |
CRC Checksum | |
MD5 Checksum | |
|
|