Log in
     
Message
  • You must login and be authorized to access this document.
3rd Amended Complaint
Details for 3rd Amended Complaint
PropertyValue
Name3rd Amended Complaint
Description

As repeated by His Honor Circuit Judge Michael Daly Hawkins;

“Truth needs no disguise”
Docketed confessions of fraud on the court are core to plaintiff’s case; but
no proper adjudication upon the merits of the condemnatory has transpired.
”In this Circuit’s case of Dixon v Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 00-70858, His Honor Michael Daly Hawkins discussed governing issues of fraud on the court, by officers of the court citing the U.S. Supreme Court case of In re Hazel-Atlas Glass v Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 247 (1944).

 

Docketed confessions of fraud on the court are core to plaintiff’s case; but
no proper adjudication upon the merits of the condemnatory has transpired.

It should be axiomatic that integrity of the judicial process and a counsel’s
loyalty to a client are sacrosanct. Yet, the gravity of artful premeditated collusion to
gain unjust enrichment via frauds on the court and betrayal of a client’s trust/
breach of court ordered fiduciary duty; has been inexplicably/intolerably ignored.

Emboldened by federal agents/agencies willful blindness and/or staunch
refusals to prosecute wealthy parties; Defendants now seek to utilize visible frauds
on court to stymie justice here. Culprits brought to (some) justice by whistleblower
are being permitted to cry vexatious. Surely a victim of organized crimes unseemly
benefiting from venal feds permitting attorneys to betray their court approved
clients; most certainly grants any quarry the right to vex the malfeasants!
FilenameRICO_eToys_Clockd_Apr14_DI_69_Motion_for_and_3rd_Amended_Complaint.pdf
Filesize2.18 MB
Filetypepdf (Mime Type: application/pdf)
Creatoradmin
Created On: 09/14/2014 21:32
ViewersEverybody
Maintained byEditor
Hits5261 Hits
Last updated on 09/14/2014 21:40
Homepage
CRC Checksum
MD5 Checksum

Latest Documents